Driven, Drilled, and CFA Piles
Introduction
In foundation engineering, the choice of pile installation method is essential for achieving stability and load-bearing capacity, especially in challenging soil conditions. Each pile installation method has unique characteristics and applications, making it crucial to understand which approach best suits a project’s specific needs. This article is the first of a two-part series, covering three foundational methods: driven piles, drilled piles, and continuous flight auger (CFA) piles.
In addition to exploring the advantages, disadvantages, and typical uses of each method, we’ll highlight how DeepFND provides tailored design solutions. With standards like AASHTO, FHWA, and more, DeepFND empowers engineers to conduct accurate calculations and optimize designs based on the specific installation method.
1. Driven Piles
Description: Driven piles are pre-formed piles, typically made of steel, concrete, or timber, that are hammered into the ground using pile-driving equipment. The process involves driving the pile until it reaches a layer of soil with adequate load-bearing capacity.
Advantages: Driven piles create minimal site disturbance, achieve immediate load-bearing capacity due to soil compaction, and are quick to install. They are highly efficient for projects with repetitive design requirements.
Disadvantages: Driving can cause noise and vibration, which may be problematic in urban or sensitive areas. It can also be challenging in hard or very dense soils.
Common Applications: Ideal for foundations in soft to medium-dense soils where pile displacement improves soil stability. They are commonly used in large infrastructure projects, such as bridges and high-rise buildings.
DeepFND Integration: DeepFND calculates axial and lateral capacities for driven piles using the AASHTO Norlund recommendations, taking installation effects into account. It supports structural checks for various pile materials and provides depth optimization based on the chosen design code.
Figure 1: Driven H section steel beam analysis results in DeepFND
5 Reasons to Choose DeepFND for Your Next Deep Foundation Project |
|
2. Drilled (Bored) Piles
Description: Drilled piles are created by excavating a hole into the ground, then filling it with concrete and reinforcement as needed. This method is suited for larger-diameter piles and can accommodate deeper foundations.
Advantages: Drilled piles generate minimal vibration and noise, making them suitable for urban or sensitive sites. They allow for large diameters and can be customized to fit varying soil profiles.
Disadvantages: Installation is slower than driven piles, and soil stability may be a concern during excavation, especially in loose or sandy soils. Temporary casings or drilling fluid may be required to support the excavation.
Common Applications: Used in high-rise buildings, bridges, and other projects requiring deep foundations in challenging soils.
DeepFND Integration: DeepFND implements the FHWA GEC-10 code for calculating geotechnical capacities of drilled piles. The software allows users to specify pile diameter and depth, offering structural checks and automatic optimization based on load demands and soil conditions.
Figure 2: Drilled reinforced concrete pile analysis results in DeepFND
3. Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piles
Description: CFA piles are drilled and cast in place in one continuous operation. An auger is used to drill into the soil, and concrete is pumped through the hollow stem of the auger as it is withdrawn, forming a pile. A prefabricated reinforcement cage is then inserted to form the final pile.
Advantages: CFA piles produce minimal noise and vibration, require no temporary casing, and can be installed quickly. This method is highly adaptable to urban and environmentally sensitive locations.
Disadvantages: This method can be limited by soil conditions, as very dense or hard soils may reduce auger efficiency.
Common Applications: Widely used in residential, commercial, and industrial projects, especially in urban environments where noise and vibration restrictions apply.
DeepFND Integration: DeepFND uses the FHWA GEC-8 standard for CFA pile designs, allowing accurate calculations of both geotechnical and structural capacities. The software considers soil conditions and provides recommendations for optimal pile depth and reinforcement.
Figure 3: CFA concrete pile analysis results in DeepFND
Conclusion (Part 1)
Deep foundation piles installed via driven, drilled, or CFA methods provide versatility across various project types and soil conditions. In Part 1, we’ve highlighted how each method offers unique benefits for different applications. DeepFND’s robust support for these methods, from geotechnical calculations to structural optimization, ensures that engineers have the tools they need for precise and efficient design.
Stay tuned for Part 2, where we’ll explore advanced installation methods like drilled displacement, micropiles, and helical piles – all supported in DeepFND to meet even the most complex project requirements.
Book A free web presentation:
